Volume 3 (2016): Issue 2

Youth perspectives on genetic inheritance, carrier status and disclosure

Open Access | | Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives
Alpha-Umaru Barrie

Abstract

Abstract

Knowledge about genetic inheritance as a concept in children and young people with bleeding disorders is synonymous, in many ways, with other inherited genetic conditions. Children and young people have a more physiological understanding of inheritance, but may hold mistaken and inaccurate beliefs in understanding basic genetics. There are complex ethical and social problems in the genetic testing of youngsters with bleeding disorders to establish carrier status. Current guideline recommendations indicate circumstances where clear psychosocial and medical benefits can be demonstrated. However, children and young people have a reduced capacity to understand the tests and their implications, and in many cases family communication may impact the extent of disclosure of genetic risk factors. This paper explores the genetics of inherited bleeding disorders, including basic knowledge of the concept of inheritance and reproductive risks. Carrier status in children and young people will be considered, drawing on legal rulings that may shed light on best practice in establishing carrier status based on genetic testing. Communication patterns within families around inherited bleeding disorders and the complicated process of disclosure will also be discussed.

Article

View Full Article

References

  • 1. Rischewski JR. Bleeding disorders: a blot on the paediatric landscape? Eur Paed 2008; 2(1): 55-57.
  • 2. Moore GW, Knight G, Blann AD. Haematology: Fundamentals of Biomedical Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • 3. Soucie JM, Evatt B, Jackson D. The Hemophilia Surveillance Project Investigators. Occurrence of haemophilia in the US. Am J Hematol 1998; 59: 288-94.
  • 4. Tuddenham EG, Pemberton S, Cooper DN. Inherited factor V11 deficiency: genetics and molecular pathology. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 313-21.
  • 5. Uprichard J, Perry DJ. Factor X deficiency. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 97-110.
  • 6. Invaskevicius, V, Seitz R, Kohler HP. International registry on factor XIII deficiency: a basis formed mostly on European data. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 914-21.
  • 7. Asselta, R, Duga S, Tenchini ML. The molecular base of quantitative fibrinogen disorder. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 2115-29.
  • 8. Girolami A, Scarano L, Saggiorato G. Congenital deficiencies and abnormalities of prothrombin. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1998; 9: 557-69.
  • 9. George JN, Caen JP, Nurden AT. Glanzmann’s thrombasthenia: the spectrum of clinical disease. Blood 1990; 75: 1383-95.
  • 10. The Centre for Genetics Education (online) www.genetics.edu.au (Accessed 24 November 2014).
  • 11. Spitzer A. Children’s knowledge of illness and treatment experiences in haemophilia. J Ped Nursing 1992; 7(1): 43-51.
  • 12. Khair K, Gibson F, Meerabeau L. Just an unfortunate coincidence? Children’s understanding of haemophilia genetics and inheritance. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 470-5.
  • 13. Gray NJ. Health information on the internet – a double-edged sword? J Adol Health 2008; 42: 432-3.
  • 14. Greenfield P, Yan Z. Children, adolescents and the internet. A new field of inquiry in developmental psychology. Dev Psychol 2006; 42: 391-4.
  • 15. Barlow J, Stapley J, Ellard D. Living with haemophilia and von Willebrand’s: a descriptive quantitative study. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 68: 235-42.
  • 16. Mähler C, Ahrens S. Intuitive biology in children’s thinking: Can preschoolers distinguish between biology and social relationships? Z Entwickl Padagogis 2003; 35 (3): 153-62.
  • 17. Terwogt MM, Stegge H, Reiffe C. Children’s understanding of inherited resemblance: the case of two parents. Int J Behav Dev 2003; 27(4): 36674.
  • 18. Williams JM, Smith LA. Social and experiential influences on the development of inheritance concepts. Int J Behav Dev 2006; 30(2): 148-57.
  • 19. Evans ME. The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school–age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2000, 46(2): 221-54.
  • 20. Thomas J. Learning about genes and evolution through formal and informal education. Studies in Science Education 2000; 35: 59-92.
  • 21. Lindvall K, Colstrup L, Woller I-M. Compliance with treatment and understanding of own disease in patients with severe and moderate haemophilia. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 47-51.
  • 22. Lindvall K, Colstrup L, Loogna K, et al. Knowledge of disease and adherence in adult patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 592-6.
  • 23. Miller K, Guelcher C, Taylor A. Haemophilia A: Patients knowledge level of treatment and sources of treatment-related information. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 73-7.
  • 24. Lanie AD, Jayaratne TE, Sheldon JP, et al. Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. J Genet Couns 2004; 13: 305-20.
  • 25. Featherstone K, Atkinson P, Bharadwaj A, Clarke A. Risky Relationships: Family, Kinship and the New Genetics Oxford: Berg, 2006.
  • 26. Szybowska M, Hewson S, Beverley JA, Babul-Hirji R. Assessing the informational need of adolescents with a genetic condition: What do they want to know? J Genet Couns 2007; 16 (2): 201-10.
  • 27. Sobel S, Cowan CB. Ambiguous loss and disenfranchised grief: The impact of DNA predictive testing on the family as a system. Fam Process 2003; 32(1): 47-57.
  • 28. McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Heise EM. Genetic risk communication: experiences of adolescent girls and young women from families with fragile X syndrome. J Genet Couns 2009; 18(4): 313-25.
  • 29. Fanos JH, Puck JM. Family pictures: growing up with a brother with X-linked SCID. Am J Med Genet 2001; 98(1): 57-63.
  • 30. Tercyak KP, Peshki BN, Demarco TA, et al. Parent-child factors and their effect on communications BRCA 1/2 test results to children. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 47 (2): 145-53.
  • 31. Forrest K, Simpson SA, Wilson BJ. To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clin Genet 2003; 64 (4): 317-26.
  • 32. Meisfeldt S, Cohn WF, Jones SM, et al. Breast cancer survivors’ attitudes about communication of breast cancer risk to their children. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2003; 119C (1): 45-50.
  • 33. Young B, Dixon-Woods M, Windridge KC, Heney D. Managing communication with young people who have a potential life threatening chronic illness: quantitative study of patients and parents. BMJ 2006; 326(7384): 305-8.
  • 34. James CA, Hadley DW, Holtzman NA, Wilkelstein MD. How does the mode of inheritance of a genetic condition influence families? A study of guilt, blame, stigma and understanding of inheritance and reproductive risks in families with X-linked and autosomal recessive diseases. Genet Med 2006; 8 (4): 234-42.
  • 35. Kessler S, Kessler H, Ward P. Psychological aspects of genetic counselling III. Management of guilt and shame. Am J Med Genet 1984; 17: 673-97.
  • 36. Weiss JO. Psychosocial stress in genetic disorders: a guide for social workers. Soc Work Health Care 1981; 6: 17-31.
  • 37. Fanos JH, Davies J, Puck JM. Sib understanding of genetics and attitudes towards carrier testing for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Am J Med Genet 2001; 98(1): 46-56.
  • 38. Conway SP, Pond MN, Hamnett T. Knowledge of adult patients with cystic fibrosis about their illness. Thorax 1996; 51: 34-8.
  • 39. Etchegary H, Perrier C. Information processing in the context of genetic risk: Implications for genetic risk communication. J Genet Couns 2007; 16: 419-32.
  • 40. Ulph F, Townsend E, Glazebrook C. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009; 9:26. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/9/26 (accessed 18 April 2016).
  • 41. Metcalfe A, Plumridge G, Coad J, et al. Parents’ and children’s communication about genetic risk: qualitative study learning from families’ experiences. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19: 640-6.
  • 42. Meza-Espinoza JP, Auguiano, LO, Rivera H. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with reproductive disorders. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008; 66(4): 237-40.
  • 43. Kulkarni R, Ponder KP, James AH, et al. Unresolved issues in diagnosis and management of inherited bleeding disorders in the perinatal period: A White Paper of the Perinatal Task Force of the Medical and Scientific Advisory Council of the National Hemophilia Foundation, USA. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 205-11.
  • 44. Miller R. Counselling about diagnosis and inheritance of genetic bleeding disorders: haemophilia A and B. Haemophilia 1999; 5:77-83.
  • 45. Jarvinen O, Aalto AM, Lebesjoki AB, et al. Carrier testing of children for two X-linked diseases in a family based setting: a retrospective long term psychosocial evaluation. J Med Genet 1999; 36: 615-20.
  • 46. Sparbel K, Driessnack M, Williams JK. The experiences of teens living in the shadow of Huntington Disease. J Genet Couns 2008; 17(4): 327-35.
  • 47. McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Sullivan JA, et al. Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: when to tell and test. Am J Med Genet 2002; 110(1): 36-44.
  • 48. Thomas S, Herbert D, Street A, et al. Attitudes towards and beliefs about genetic testing in the haemophilia community: a quantitative study. Haemophilia 2007; 13: 633-41.
  • 49. James CA, Holtzman NA, Hadley DW. Perceptions of reproductive risk and carrier testing among adolescent sisters of males with chronic granulomatous disease. Am J Med Genet 2003; 119(1): 60-9.
  • 50. Järvinen O, Hietala M, Aalto AM, et al. A retrospective study of the psychosocial consequences and satisfaction after carrier testing in children with an autosomal recessive disease: aspartyglucosaminuria. Clin Genet 2000; 58: 447-54.
  • 51. Jolly A, Parsons E, Clarke A. Identifying carriers of balanced translocation: Interviews with family members. In: Clarke AJ ed. The Genetic Testing of Children Oxford. BIOS Scientific Publishers, 1998: 61-90.
  • 52. McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Sullivan JA, et al. Carrier testing in the fragile X syndrome: effect on self-concept. Am J Med Genet 2000; 92: 336-42.
  • 53. Dunn NF, Miller A, Griffioen A, Lee CA. Carrier testing in haemophilia A and B: adult carriers’ and their partners’ experiences and their views on the testing of young females. Haemophilia 2008; 14: 584-92.
  • 54. McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridoglozzi GA. “Family matters”: a conceptual framework for genetic testing in children. J Genet Couns 2004; 13(1): 9-29.
  • 55. British Society for Human Genetics. Report on the Genetic Testing of Children. 2010. Available from http://www.bsgm.org.uk/media/678741/gtoc_booklet_final_new.pdf (accessed 18 April 2016).
  • 56. Rew L, Mackert M, Bonevac D. A systematic review of literature about the genetic testing of adolescents. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2009; 14(4): 284-94.
  • 57. Borry P, Goffin T, Nys H, Dierickx K. Attitudes regarding carrier testing in incompetent children: a survey of European clinical geneticists. Eur J Hum Genet 2007; 15 (12): 1211-7.
  • 58. Rosen A, Wallenstein S, McGovern MM. Attitudes of pediatric residents towards ethical issues associated with genetic testing in children. Pediatrics 2002; 110(2): 360-3.
  • 59. Kaye J. Testing times: what is the legal situation when an adolescent wants a genetic test? Clinical Ethics 2007; 2: 176-80.
  • 60. Borry P, Stultiens L, Goffin T, Nys H and Dierickx K. Minors and informed consent in carrier testing: a survey of European clinical geneticists. J Med Ethics 2008; 34 (5): 370-374
  • 61. Winikoff R, Lee C. Hemophilia carrier status and counseling the symptomatic and asymptomatic adolescent. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010; 23(6): S43-7.
  • 62. Borry P, Fryns JP, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. Carrier testing in minors. a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14:133-8.
  • 63. Hogben S, Boddington P. Policy recommendations for carrier testing and predictive testing in childhood. A distinction that makes a real difference. J Genet Couns 2005; 14(4): 271-82.
  • 64. Clarke A. The genetic testing of children Washington, DC: BIOS Scientific, 1998.
  • 65. Clarke A, Flinter R. The genetic testing of children: a clinical perspective. In: T. Marteau and M Richards eds, The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 164-76.
  • 66. Fanos JH, Johnson JP. Barriers to carrier testing for adult cystic fibrosis sibs: the importance of not knowing. Am J Med Genet 1995; 59: 85-91.
  • 67. Elgar BS, Harding TW. Testing adolescents for a hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1): respecting their autonomy is in their best interest. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 113-9.
  • 68. Clayton EW. Genetic testing in children. J Med Philos 1997; 22(3):233-51.
  • 69. Ludlam CA, Pasi KJ, Bolton-Maggs P, et al. A framework for genetic service provision for haemophilia and inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 145-63.
  • 70. Wehbe RM, Spiridigliozzi GA, Heise EM, et al. When to tell and test for genetic carrier status perspectives of adolescents and young adults from fragile X families. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A(6): 1190-9.
  • 71. Gregory M, Boddington P, Dimond R, et al. Communicating about haemophilia within the family: the importance of context and of experience. Haemophilia 2007; 13(2): 189-98.
  • 72. Bowen DJ, Bourcier E, Press N, et al. Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing. Community Genet 2004; 7(1):25-32.
  • 73. Croyle RT, Lerman C. Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 25: 59-66.
  • 74. Kenen R, Ardern-Jones A, Eeles R. We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer. Psychooncology 2004; 13(5): 335-45.
  • 75. Wilson BJ, Forest K, van Teijlingen ER, et al. Family communication about genetic risk: The little that is known. Community Genet 2004; 7(1): 15-24.
  • 76. Henneman L, Kooij L, Bouman K, ten Kate LP. Personal experiences of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier couples prospectively identified in CF families. Am J Med Genet 2002; 110(4): 324-31
  • 77. Hamilton RJ, Bowers BJ, Williams JK. Disclosing genetic test results to family members. J Nurs Scholarsh 2005; 37(1): 18-34
  • 78. Smith KR, Zick CD, Mayer RN, Botkin JR. Voluntary disclosure of BRCA1 mutation test results. Genet Test 2002; 6(2): 89-92.
  • 79. Sorenson JR, Jennings-Grant T, Newman J. Communication about carrier testing within hemophilia A families. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2003; 119C (1): 3-10.
  • 80. Anido A, Carlson LM, Taft L, Sherman SL. Women’s attitudes toward testing for fragile X carrier status: a qualitative analysis. J Genet Couns 2007; 14(4): 295-306.
  • 81. Stoffel EM, Ford B, Mercado RC, et al. Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: communication with close and distant relatives. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6(3): 333-8.
  • 82. Beeton K, Neal D, Watson T, Lee, CA. Parents of children with haemophilia- a transforming experience. Haemophilia 2007; 13(5): 570-9.
  • 83. Cassis F. Psychosocial Care for People with Hemophilia. World Federation of Hemophilia Treatment of Haemophilia Monographs 44, 2007. Available from http://www1.wfh.org/publications/files/pdf-1198.pdf (accessed 18 April 2016).
  • 84. Hern, MJ, Beery, TA, Barry DG. Experiences of college-age youth in families with a recessive genetic condition. J Fam Nurs 2006; 12(2): 119-42.

PDF Download

Download PDF

Open in full-page viewer

Authors

  • Alpha-Umaru Barrie

    alpha.barrie@gosh.nhs.uk
    Clinical Nurse Specialist/Research Nurse, Haemophilia Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, UK