Volume 12 (2025): Issue 1

The impact of home therapy interventions on treatment adherence and patient independence in haemophilia management in Assam, India

Open Access | | Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives
Anupam Dutta ORCID iD
Ajun Ngongpa ORCID iD
Papari Gogoi ORCID iD

Abstract

Abstract Background

Haemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder requiring regular factor replacement therapy, often necessitating frequent hospital visits. Home therapy (HT) has emerged as a viable alternative, improving patient independence and adherence. This study evaluates the impact of a structured home therapy intervention at Assam Medical College and Hospital on treatment adherence, self-infusion rates, and quality of life among haemophilia patients.

Methods

This was a prospective interventional study conducted over from January 2023 to January 2024, involving 29 people with haemophilia (PWH). Participants underwent structured self-infusion training, nurse-led home visits, and education on prophylactic therapy. Data was collected at three time points (pre-HT, mid-HT, and post-HT) using standardised surveys assessing adherence, self-infusion rates, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and McNemar's test for pre-post comparisons.

Results

The study observed a 75% adoption of self-infusion, up from 38% at baseline. Prophylactic therapy uptake increased by 56%, while adherence to twice-weekly dosing improved from 76% to 83%. Patients reported 93% improvement in mobility and 82% reduction in joint pain and bleeding episodes. Dependence on healthcare providers decreased by 55%, as more patients transitioned to self-administration. The overall satisfaction score was 99%, reflecting high acceptance of the intervention.

Conclusion

Structured home therapy significantly improved treatment adherence, self-infusion practices, and patient independence, reducing the burden on healthcare providers. The findings support home-based models as a scalable approach for managing haemophilia in resource-limited settings. Future studies should explore multicentre validation and integration of telehealth solutions to sustain these benefits.

Article

View Full Article

References

  • 1. Ghosh K Ghosh K. Overcoming the challenges of treating hemophilia in resource-limited nations: a focus on medication access and adherence. Expert Rev Hematol 2021; 8: 721–730. doi: https://doi.org/10.10.1080/17474086.2021.1957826.
  • 2. Ndoumba-Mintya A, Diallo YL, Tayou TC, Mbanya D. Optimizing haemophilia care in resource-limited countries: current challenges and future prospects. J Blood Med 2023; 14: 141–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S291536.
  • 3. Mahlangu J, Diop S, Lavin M. Diagnosis and treatment challenges in lower resource countries: State-of-the-art. Haemophilia 2024; 30(S3): 78–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14956.
  • 4. Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al.; WFH Guidelines for the Management of Haemophilia panelists and co-authors. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Haemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia 2020;26 Suppl 6:1–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14046. Erratum in: Haemophilia 2021;27(4):699. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14308.
  • 5. Singh P, Mukherjee K. Cost-benefit analysis and assessment of quality of care in patients with haemophilia undergoing treatment at National Rural Health Mission in Maharashtra, India. Value Health Reg Issues 2017; 12: 101–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2016.11.003.
  • 6. Qian W, Lam TT, Lam HHW, Li CK, Cheung YT. Telehealth Interventions for Improving Self-Management in Patients With Haemophilia: Scoping Review of Clinical Studies. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21(7): e12340. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/12340.
  • 7. Lam JCM, John MJ, Street A; Asia Pacific Haemophilia Working Group (APHWG). A survey of characteristics and current educational needs of haemophilia treatment centers within Asia Pacific. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2018; 2(3): 508–517. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12108.
  • 8. Lock J, Raat H, Peters M, et al. Optimization of home treatment in haemophilia: effects of transmural support by a haemophilia nurse on adherence and quality of life. Haemophilia 2016; 22(6): 841–851. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13043.
  • 9. García-Dasí M, Aznar JA, Jiménez-Yuste V, et al. Adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life in children and adolescents with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2015; 21(4): 458–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.12618.
  • 10. Khair K. Haemophilia: diagnosis, management and nursing care of patients. Nursing Times [online] 2021; 117: 10, 34–38. https://www.nursingtimes.net/haematology/haemophiliadiagnosis-management-and-nursing-care-of-patients-13-09-2021/.
  • 11. Evatt BL. The natural evolution of haemophilia care: developing and sustaining comprehensive care globally. Haemophilia 2006;12 Suppl 3: 13–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01256.x.
  • 12. Khair K. The changing role of the specialist haemophilia nurse. Nursing Times [online]. 9 August 2021. https://www.nursingtimes.net/haematology/the-changing-role-of-the-specialist-haemophilia-nurse-09-08-2021/.
  • 13. Mulders G, Uitslager N, Kavanagh M, et al. The role of the specialist nurse in comprehensive care for bleeding disorders in Europe: an integrative review. Haemophilia 2024; 30(3): 598–608. doi: https://doi.org/10/1111.hae.14974.
  • 14. Pollard D, Harrison C, Dodgson S, et al. The UK haemophilia specialist nurse: Competencies fit for practice in the 21st century. Haemophilia 2020; 26(4): 622–630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14002.
  • 15. Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe haemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(6): 535–544. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067659.
  • 16. Stonebraker JS, Brooker M, Farrugia A, Srivastava A. A study of reported factor concentrate use around the world. Haemophilia 2010; 16(1): 33–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02131.x.
  • 17. Van Camp YP, Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM. Nurse-led interventions to enhance adherence to chronic medication: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 69(4): 761–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-012-1419-y.
  • 18. Makris M. Prophylaxis in haemophilia should be life-long. Blood Transfus 2012; 10(2): 165–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.2450/2012.0147-11.
  • 19. Miners AH, Sabin CA, Tolley KH, Lee CA. Assessing health-related quality of life in individuals with haemophilia. Haemophilia 1999; 5(6): 378–385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2516.1999.00347.x.
  • 20. Santaella ME, Bloomberg M, Anglade D. Home infusion teaching practices at federally funded hemophilia treatment centers in the United States of America. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2017; 1(1): 81–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12020.
  • 21. Hansson H, Castor C, Larsen H, Topperzer M, Olesen M. Development of an eHealth intervention in pediatric home infusion therapy: Interview study of needs and preferences of parents and health care professionals. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025; 8:e63260. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/63260.

PDF Download

Download PDF

Open in full-page viewer

Authors

  • Anupam Dutta

    ORCID iD
    dranupamdutta80@gmail.com
    Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, India

  • Ajun Ngongpa

    ORCID iD
    Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, India

  • Papari Gogoi

    ORCID iD
    Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, India