Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Admin menu

Volume 8 (2021): Issue 1

Red Flag Study: An observational cross-sectional survey looking at bleeding in patients with a bleeding disorder who are lost to follow-up

Abstract

Abstract Background

Regular follow-up visits and routine care is important for people with a mild bleeding disorder in terms of lowering their risk of complications from untreated bleeds and helping them maintain a healthy lifestyle. However, follow-up visits among this population can sometimes be missed for unclear reasons.

Aim

The present study aimed to question if lost-to-follow-up patients with a bleeding disorder experience unreported but important bleeding events that are not communicated to their haemophilia treatment centre (HTC) and if they could benefit from more frequent clinic visits.

Methods

A multicentre paper-based cross-sectional survey was sent to people diagnosed with an inherited blood disorder and lost to follow-up for two years or more. Those who met the eligibility criteria received the survey by mail and completed and returned it to their HTC between October 2015 and July 2016.

Results

Invitation packages were sent to 71 individuals; 14 questionnaires returned, with a survey response rate of 19.7%. Of the 14 returned surveys, only 11 participants were eligible who either responded completely or partially to the survey. Quality of life was reported as almost never or never a problem by all but one participant, who limited activities due to bleeding problems. Spontaneous nosebleeds were sometimes, often or always a problem for three participants; one female participant reported issues associated with heavy menstrual bleeding as often or almost always a problem.

Conclusion

We concluded that although the mean annual bleeding self-reported events were relatively low, they cannot be underestimated when keeping in mind the limitations and challenges of accessing data among this population. Our study highlighted the importance of educating this group of patients on their bleeding disorder and engaging them in their own care and health status, which may result in improving their health-related quality of life and overall health outcomes.

Article

View Full Article

References

  • 1. American Society of Hematology. Bleeding Disorders. Available from: https://www.hematology.org/Patients/Bleeding.aspx (accessed 5 November 2019).
  • 2. Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Hemophilia 2020; 26(Suppl 6):1–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14046.
  • 3. Peyvandi F, Tavakkoli F, Frame D, et al. Burden of mild haemophilia A: Systematic literature review. Haemophilia. 2019; 25(5): 755–763. doi.org/10.1111/hae.13777.
  • 4. Benson G, Auerswalkd G, Dolan G, et al. Diagnosis and care of patients with mild haemophilia: practical recommendations for clinical management. Blood Transfus 2018; 16(1): 535–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.2450/2017.0150-17.
  • 5. Byams VR, Anderson BL, Grant AM, et al. Evaluation of bleeding disorders in women with menorrhagia: a survey of obstetrician gynecologists. Am J Obstet. Gynecol 2012; 207: 269.e1–269.e5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.010.
  • 6. Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, et al. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17:991–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020016922473.
  • 7. Silva MS, Smith WT, Bammer G. Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56(2):115–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.2.115.
  • 8. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(10):1129–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1.
  • 9. Saxena K. Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia. J Blood Med 2013; 4: 49–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S43734.
  • 10. Kulkarni R. Use of telehealth in the delivery of comprehensive care for patients with haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2018; 24(1): 33–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13364.
  • 11. Nazzaro AM, Owens S, Hoots WK, Larson KL. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of youths in the US hemophilia population: results of a national survey. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1618–1622. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.075234.

PDF Download

Download PDF

Open in full-page viewer

Authors

  • Doaa Abdelfattah

    ORCID iD
    dabdelfattah@cheo.on.ca
    Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada .
  • Alicia E. Klaassen

    ORCID iD
    Department of Pharmacy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Heather Perkins

    ORCID iD
    Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Diane Bissonette

    Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Dorine Belliveau

    ORCID iD
    Division of Hematology/Oncology, Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB, Canada
  • Robert J. Klaassen

    ORCID iD
    Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada