Haemophilia A is a congenital bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency [1]. Disease severity depends on the level of FVIII in blood and ranges from mild (>5% to <40%), to moderate (1% to 5%), and severe (<1%) [2]. Severe haemophilia A is associated with serious spontaneous bleeding in muscles, soft tissues, and joints [3].

Haemarthrosis, or bleeding into joints, is one of the clinical hallmarks of haemophilia A and occurs most commonly in knees, elbows, and ankles [4]. Early manifestations of acute haemarthrosis are mild discomfort and slight limitation of joint motion, followed by pain, joint swelling and cutaneous warmth [5].

Haemophilic arthropathy is a serious complication of haemophilia-induced joint bleeding [6]. It is characterised by synovitis of the joint, which in turn increases the tendency of frequently recurring haemarthroses in the same joint. This is followed by narrowing of the joint space due to loss of the cartilage, development of bone cysts, chronic pain, and limitation of motion, leading to permanent disability [5].

The standard of care for haemophilia A is the intravenous administration of FVIII concentrate to treat or prevent bleeding [7]. However, treatments are now being developed to overcome the disadvantages associated with FVIII concentrates, particularly frequent intravenous administration and development of inhibitors (anti-FVIII antibodies) [8]. Emicizumab is a novel non-factor replacement therapeutic agent with proven efficacy for preventing or reducing the frequency of bleeding episodes in adults and children with haemophilia A with or without inhibitors [9]. It is a bispecific monoclonal antibody designed to mimic the activity of activated FVIII [8].

In clinical studies, subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis has shown clinically significant prevention or reduction of bleeding episodes in children aged <12 years with haemophilia A with or without inhibitors [10,11]. It has also shown considerable improvement in health-related quality of life (QoL) [12]. We report a case of a child with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors, complicated by haemarthrosis, and successfully treated with emicizumab.

CASE PRESENTATION

Q is an Omani boy, now 10 years old, with a history of severe haemophilia A and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. He was diagnosed at the age of 6 months when he presented with spontaneous bruising with a FVIII level of < 1%. Since then, he has been on regular follow-up in the Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology at the Royal Hospital, Muscat. He has a strong family history of haemophilia, with one maternal uncle and six maternal cousins affected. His parents are first cousins; his three other sisters have no significant medical issues.

Since being diagnosed, Q had frequent emergency department (ED) visits with haematomas and was managed with on-demand plasma-derived FVIII. At the age of one year, he was started on prophylactic treatment with 250 IU (40 IU/kg) plasma-derived FVIII three times per week after inserting a port-a-cath. As per our local protocol, the prophylactic dose of FVIII is 25–40 IU/kg and the on-demand therapy dose is 50 IU/kg. Recombinant FVIII was not available due to supply issues.

Q’s subsequent clinical course was complicated by multiple breakthrough bleeding episodes, including haemarthrosis (knee and elbow), some of which required hospital admission. The frequency of breakthrough bleeding episodes continued to increase. In addition to repeated visits to the emergency department, he had seven hospital admissions in 2018 (he was 6 years old). Although some episodes were caused by minor trauma, most were spontaneous. He also developed a right elbow target joint. Based on physical examination, joint health has been grossly normal. Normal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of bilateral knee joints was undertaken with no abnormality identified.

Doses of prophylactic FVIII were adjusted as per our local protocol. His FVIII inhibitor screening has always been negative. Serologies for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus were also negative.

The worsening of the child’s clinical course was attributed to multiple factors. He is overweight (body mass index (BMI) 19.8 kg/m2; 88th percentile) with difficult intravenous access. Furthermore, he had two port-a-cath insertions in different locations (first port-a-cath inserted for 3 months and the second for 6 months) but both had to be removed due to infection and thrombosis. Moreover, he could not be started on home treatment due to his mother’s hesitation. This resulted in difficulties in prophylactic treatment administration. He also had difficult socioeconomic circumstances. His mother left her job after his condition worsened. The child was transferred to a school near the treating centre to accommodate frequent hospital visits, as he had to attend regularly to receive prophylactic and on-demand treatment. His mother was offered psychological support.

Taking the aforementioned challenges into consideration, treating physicians decided to start Q on emicizumab. It took some time for the hospital administration to agree on this therapy since he did not have inhibitors, which was the only indication approved by them to start the drug. Emicizumab was started on 13 March 2019 (when he was 7 years old) with an initial weekly dose of 3 mg/kg injected subcutaneously for 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/Kg weekly as per protocol.

The introduction of emicizumab has resulted in substantial clinical improvement. Q had no breakthrough bleeding for almost two years after starting emicizumab, except for one episode of trauma-induced haemarthrosis. His annual bleeding rate (ABR) improved from 14 to around 1–2, and he did not experience any significant joint pain or swelling. He has returned to regular school and has shown improvement in academic grades. His mother returned to work, which has also resulted in socio-economic improvement. Latest investigations revealed normal blood counts and blood chemistry (renal function, liver function), and bone profile. Complete blood count (including white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets) is done at our centre for patients with haemophilia treated with emicizumab to monitor for the risk of thrombotic microangiopathy, to detect early thrombocytopenia or anaemia. For our patient, complete blood count has always been within normal ranges.

After one year of starting emicizumab, our patient complained of multiple joint pain with no swelling. MRI of knee and elbow joints was done and showed no abnormal findings. He has continued to receive a weekly dose of 1.5 mg/kg emicizumab administered subcutaneously at home and is followed up in clinic every 3 months.

A timeline of the case is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Timeline showing key events in the case reported, from haemophilia diagnosis to treatment with emicizumab.

ABR: Annualised Bleed Rate; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

graphic/j_jhp-2025-0004_fig_001.jpg

DISCUSSION

Haemarthrosis is a major complication of haemophilia A [13]. Appropriate management of joint disease in people with haemophilia A includes early prevention and treatment of acute joint bleeds before the onset of degenerative arthropathy [3,14]. Starting prophylaxis with factor concentrates at an early age helps to prevent and reduce the risk of joint bleeding and arthropathy [15,16,17]. The child in our case study started receiving prophylactic doses of FVIII at an early age after being diagnosed with haemophilia A. This timely management may explain the normal findings of the latest MRI of his joints. Poor management of recurrent haemarthrosis can result in abnormal bone growth and limb length, chronic synovitis, degenerative arthritis [14,18], chronic pain [13], reduced range of movement of joints [19], and impaired QoL [13].

Emicizumab was initiated for the child after being poorly compliant to FVIII prophylactic treatment. Emicizumab is the first non-factor therapy approved for prophylaxis in haemophilia A [20]. Its subcutaneous route of administration represents a convenient choice for self-administration away from central venous access devices and hospital admission; thus supporting improved compliance to treatment. Ultimately, this can help promote an active lifestyle and improve health-related QoL [21]. In addition, several clinical trials have demonstrated that emicizumab is effective and safe for the prevention of bleeding in children and adults with haemophilia A irrespective of FVIII inhibitors. Emicizumab prophylaxis showed substantial reduction in ABRs of treated bleeds, and most participants receiving emicizumab (54% to 90%) did not report any treated bleeds [10,22,23,24]. Similarly, long-term emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with low ABRs and reduced bleeding into joints with no new events [25].

In the HAVEN 2 clinical trial, which included children <12 years with haemophilia A with inhibitors, 100% of all evaluable target joints resolved during the study period [10]. The World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) guidelines recommend using emicizumab prophylaxis to prevent haemarthrosis, and both spontaneous and breakthrough bleeding in persons with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors [26]. Our child did not experience joint bleeding, pain, or swelling after the initiation of emicizumab. This improvement in his clinical status may be reflected as an improvement in the patient’s QoL and support maintenance of joint health into adulthood [10]. However, standard QoL assessment was not available.

Intravenous administration of FVIII concentrate, frequent hospital visits, and haemarthrosis were factors that impaired the child’s QoL. However, his clinical and socio-economic status were improved after the initiation of emicizumab administered subcutaneously, once weekly, and at home. In particular, substantial physical health and clinical improvement were characterised by no breakthrough bleeding for almost the first two years, improvement in ABR improved, and no significant joint pain or swelling. In terms of daily activities, he has returned to regular school and has shown improvement in academic grades. The HAVEN 2 clinical trial assessed the impact of emicizumab prophylaxis on health-related QoL in children with haemophilia A and their caregivers. Results showed that emicizumab was associated with substantial and sustained improvements in health-related QoL in both children with haemophilia A and their caregivers [12]. Children’s health-related QoL improved in terms of physical health, reduced absence from school, and fewer hospitalisations; caregivers observed similar improvements in their children’s health-related QoL [12]. The HAVEN2 trial also demonstrated that emicizumab reduced caregiver burden and increased their satisfaction with treatment. This was further emphasised by improvements reported in the ‘Family Life’ domain of QoL [12]. In a similar context, our patient’s mother returned back to work, which was accompanied by socio-economic improvement.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab was introduced as a novel non-factor therapy for haemophilia A, representing an effective and convenient alternative to conventional FVIII concentrate. The subcutaneous route of administration, without the need for hospital admission, made emicizumab a suitable option for self- or home-administration, thus, treatment compliance was improved in the case reported here. Consequently, disease-related complications, particularly haemarthrosis, were resolved and the QoL of the child and his caregiver was improved after the initiation of emicizumab.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the patient and his family. They also thank Mohammad Yassine, BPharm, MSc, and Racha Aaraj, Pharm D, MSc, MPH from Phoenix Clinical Research for the support in the preparation of this manuscript.

Notes

[1] Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient for the publication of the present case report.

[2] Declaration of funding

Phoenix Clinical Research provided editorial and medical writing assistance for the preparation of this manuscript based on the Good Publication Practice (GPP 2022) and the ICMJE requirements. Writing assistance was funded by Roche. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors. The authors retained the editorial process, including the discussion at all times. There was no financial reward associated with writing the paper.

[3] Conflict of interests

MW has received fees for lectures from the Oman Medical Specialty Board.

IAG has received fees for lectures from the Oman Medical Specialty Board.

[4] Ethics approval

Not applicable

[5] Contributed by Author contributions

All authors were involved in the conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data; the drafting of the paper revising it critically for intellectual content; and the final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Both authors were involved in patient’s management and care.

REFERENCES

1. 

Kaneda M, Kawasaki R, Matsumoto N, et al. Detailed analysis of anti-emicizumab antibody decreasing drug efficacy, using plasma samples from a patient with hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2021; 19: 2938–46. doi: 10.1111/jth.15506.

M KanedaR KawasakiN MatsumotoDetailed analysis of anti-emicizumab antibody decreasing drug efficacy, using plasma samples from a patient with hemophilia AJ Thromb Haemost20211929384610.1111/jth.15506

2. 

Kulkarni R, Soucie JM. Pediatric hemophilia: a review. Semin Thromb Hemost 2011; 37: 737–44. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297164.

R KulkarniJM SouciePediatric hemophilia: a reviewSemin Thromb Hemost2011377374410.1055/s-0031-1297164

3. 

Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia 2013; 19: e1–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02909.x.

A SrivastavaAK BrewerEP Mauser-BunschotenGuidelines for the management of hemophiliaHaemophilia201319e14710.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02909.x

4. 

Berntorp E, Shapiro AD. Modern haemophilia care. Lancet 2012; 379: 1447–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61139-2.

E BerntorpAD ShapiroModern haemophilia careLancet201237914475610.1016/S0140-6736(11)61139-2

5. 

Roosendaal G, Lafeber FP. Pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2006; 12 Suppl 3: 117–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01268.x.

G RoosendaalFP LafeberPathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathyHaemophilia200612Suppl 31172110.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01268.x

6. 

Kuijlaars I a. R, Timmer MA, de Kleijn P, Pisters MF, Fischer K. Monitoring joint health in haemophilia: Factors associated with deterioration. Haemophilia 2017; 23: 934–40. doi: 10.1111/hae.13327.

I a. R KuijlaarsMA TimmerP de KleijnMF PistersK FischerMonitoring joint health in haemophilia: Factors associated with deteriorationHaemophilia2017239344010.1111/hae.13327

7. 

Witmer C, Young G. Factor VIII inhibitors in hemophilia A: rationale and latest evidence. Ther Adv Hematol 2013; 4: 59–72. doi: 10.1177/2040620712464509.

C WitmerG YoungFactor VIII inhibitors in hemophilia A: rationale and latest evidenceTher Adv Hematol20134597210.1177/2040620712464509

8. 

Blair HA. Emicizumab: A review in haemophilia A. Drugs 2019; 79: 1697–707. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01200-2.

HA BlairEmicizumab: A review in haemophilia ADrugs201979169770710.1007/s40265-019-01200-2

9. 

US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves emicizumabkxwh for hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors. 2019. Available from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-emicizumab-kxwhhemophilia-or-without-factor-viii-inhibitors (accessed 12 November 2022).

US Food and Drug AdministrationFDA approves emicizumabkxwh for hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors2019Available from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-emicizumab-kxwhhemophilia-or-without-factor-viii-inhibitors (accessed 12 November 2022).

10. 

Young G, Liesner R, Chang T, et al. A multicenter, open-label phase 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with inhibitors. Blood 2019; 134: 2127–38. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001869.

G YoungR LiesnerT ChangA multicenter, open-label phase 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with inhibitorsBlood201913421273810.1182/blood.2019001869

11. 

Shima M, Nogami K, Nagami S, et al. A multicentre, open-label study of emicizumab given every 2 or 4 weeks in children with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors. Haemophilia 2019; 25: 979–87. doi: 10.1111/hae.13848.

M ShimaK NogamiS NagamiA multicentre, open-label study of emicizumab given every 2 or 4 weeks in children with severe haemophilia A without inhibitorsHaemophilia2019259798710.1111/hae.13848

12. 

Mancuso ME, Mahlangu J, Sidonio R, et al. Health-related quality of life and caregiver burden of emicizumab in children with haemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors-Results from the HAVEN 2 study. Haemophilia 2020; 26: 1009–18. doi: 10.1111/hae.14183.

ME MancusoJ MahlanguR SidonioHealth-related quality of life and caregiver burden of emicizumab in children with haemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors-Results from the HAVEN 2 studyHaemophilia20202610091810.1111/hae.14183

13. 

Knobe K, Berntorp E. Haemophilia and joint disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. J Comorbidity 2011; 1: 51–9. doi: 10.15256/joc.2011.1.2.

K KnobeE BerntorpHaemophilia and joint disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and managementJ Comorbidity2011151910.15256/joc.2011.1.2

14. 

Raffini L, Manno C. Modern management of haemophilic arthropathy. Br J Haematol 2007; 136: 777–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06490.x.

L RaffiniC MannoModern management of haemophilic arthropathyBr J Haematol20071367778710.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06490.x

15. 

Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 535–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659.

MJ Manco-JohnsonTC AbshireAD ShapiroProphylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophiliaN Engl J Med20073575354410.1056/NEJMoa067659

16. 

Khawaji M, Astermark J, Akesson K, Berntorp E. Physical activity and joint function in adults with severe haemophilia on long-term prophylaxis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2011; 22: 50–5. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32834128c6.

M KhawajiJ AstermarkK AkessonE BerntorpPhysical activity and joint function in adults with severe haemophilia on long-term prophylaxisBlood Coagul Fibrinolysis20112250510.1097/MBC.0b013e32834128c6

17. 

Coppola A, Di Capua M, De Simone C. Primary prophylaxis in children with haemophilia. Blood Transfus 2008; 6 Suppl 2:s 4–11. doi: 10.2450/2008.0030-08.

A CoppolaM Di CapuaC De SimonePrimary prophylaxis in children with haemophiliaBlood Transfus20086Suppl 2s 41110.2450/2008.0030-08

18. 

Mauser-Bunschoten EP, Fransen Van De Putte DE, Schutgens REG. Co-morbidity in the ageing haemophilia patient: the down side of increased life expectancy. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 853–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.01987.x.

EP Mauser-BunschotenDE Fransen Van De PutteREG SchutgensCo-morbidity in the ageing haemophilia patient: the down side of increased life expectancyHaemophilia2009158536310.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.01987.x

19. 

Soucie JM, Cianfrini C, Janco RL, et al. Joint range-of-motion limitations among young males with hemophilia: prevalence and risk factors. Blood 2004; 103: 2467–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1457.

JM SoucieC CianfriniRL JancoJoint range-of-motion limitations among young males with hemophilia: prevalence and risk factorsBlood200410324677310.1182/blood-2003-05-1457

20. 

Mannucci PM. Hemophilia therapy: the future has begun. Haematologica 2020; 105: 545–53. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.232132.

PM MannucciHemophilia therapy: the future has begunHaematologica20201055455310.3324/haematol.2019.232132

21. 

Cafuir L, Kruse-Jarres R, Mancuso ME, Kempton CL. Emicizumab for hemophilia A without inhibitors. Expert Rev Hematol 2019; 12: 515–24. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2019.1624519.

L CafuirR Kruse-JarresME MancusoCL KemptonEmicizumab for hemophilia A without inhibitorsExpert Rev Hematol2019125152410.1080/17474086.2019.1624519

22. 

Oldenburg J, Mahlangu JN, Kim B, et al. Emicizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A with inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 809–18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703068.

J OldenburgJN MahlanguB KimEmicizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A with inhibitorsN Engl J Med20173778091810.1056/NEJMoa1703068

23. 

Mahlangu J, Oldenburg J, Paz-Priel I, et al. Emicizumab prophylaxis in patients who have hemophilia A without inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 811–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803550.

J MahlanguJ OldenburgI Paz-PrielEmicizumab prophylaxis in patients who have hemophilia A without inhibitorsN Engl J Med20183798112210.1056/NEJMoa1803550

24. 

Pipe SW, Shima M, Lehle M, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of emicizumab prophylaxis given every 4 weeks in people with haemophilia A (HAVEN 4): a multicentre, open-label, non-randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol 2019; 6: e295–305. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30054-7.

SW PipeM ShimaM LehleEfficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of emicizumab prophylaxis given every 4 weeks in people with haemophilia A (HAVEN 4): a multicentre, open-label, non-randomised phase 3 studyLancet Haematol20196e29530510.1016/S2352-3026(19)30054-7

25. 

Callaghan MU, Negrier C, Paz-Priel I, et al. Long-term outcomes with emicizumab prophylaxis for hemophilia A with or without FVIII inhibitors from the HAVEN 1–4 studies. Blood 2021; 137: 2231–42. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009217.

MU CallaghanC NegrierI Paz-PrielLong-term outcomes with emicizumab prophylaxis for hemophilia A with or without FVIII inhibitors from the HAVEN 1–4 studiesBlood202113722314210.1182/blood.2020009217

26. 

Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia 2020; 26 Suppl 6: 1–158. doi: 10.1111/hae.14046.

A SrivastavaE SantagostinoA DougallWFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd editionHaemophilia202026Suppl 6115810.1111/hae.14046